Re: Edited, Final & Leg data

From: P A Hill & E V Goodall <goodhill_at_xmission.com>
Date: Mon Apr 07 2003 - 17:34:30 CEST


Peter MATTHEWS wrote:
> Accepted Data - Corrected, Uncorrected, No Corrections

Peter,

Thanks for taking me up on the idea that "final" didn't make sense when talking about a processing model which suggests a long series of various steps one may have done before this particular version of the data and various sets one might perform on the data afterwards. I couldn't come up with a term, but "accepted" sounds like a good one.

-P.Hill Received on Mon Apr 7 17:38:37 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 05 2004 - 18:49:13 CEST