RE: Other areas that haven't been discussed.

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: John Halleck (John.Halleck_at_utah.edu)
Date: Sun Feb 11 2001 - 23:14:36 CET 

Received: (from mdom_at_localhost) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id XAA02806 for cavexml-outgoing; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:14:46 +0100
Received: from cor.oz.cc.utah.edu (nahaj_at_cor.oz.cc.utah.edu [155.99.2.2]) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id XAA02802 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:14:40 +0100
Received: from localhost (nahaj_at_localhost) by cor.oz.cc.utah.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA26821 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:14:37 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:14:36 -0700 (MST)
From: John Halleck <John.Halleck_at_utah.edu>
To: "'cavexml_at_cartography.ch'" <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>
Subject: RE: Other areas that haven't been discussed.
In-Reply-To: <9718D3B1ED18D31180F000A0C99DE22301F7E94A_at_ihmdex03.ih.navy.mil>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10102111512310.26377-100000@cor.oz.cc.utah.edu>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cavexml_at_karto.baug.ethz.ch
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch

On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Thrun Robert IHMD wrote:

> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:46:31 -0500
> From: Thrun Robert IHMD <ThrunR_at_ih.navy.mil>
> Reply-To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch
> To: "'cavexml_at_cartography.ch'" <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>
> Subject: RE: Other areas that haven't been discussed.
>
> On Thursday, February 08, 2001 7:52 PM, John Halleck said:
>
> > Identification of a spanning tree.
> > Most graph programs I've seen (and therefore I assume cave
> > survey programs) find loops by working from a (minimal)
> > spanning tree. This takes processing to find, but one only
> > needs to note if they are in the tree or not...)
>
> Any program that uses a spanning tree will generate its own
> using the survey data.

  As a statement of fact this is silly. (I.E. Your program
  starts from scratch every time, therefore you assume that
  everybody wants to do this.)
  
  By the same reasoning everybody currently parses their own,
  so we have no need of an interchange standard.

> Bob Thrun
>

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 18:00:00 CET