From: Paul & Eleanor (goodhill_at_xmission.com)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 09:20:13 CET
Received: (from mdom_at_localhost) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id JAA05342 for cavexml-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:16:41 +0100 Received: from mail.xmission.com (mail.xmission.com [198.60.22.22]) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id JAA05338 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:16:40 +0100 Received: from slc378.modem.xmission.com ([166.70.2.124] helo=xmission.com) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14SEA5-0003XA-00 for cavexml_at_cartography.ch; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 01:16:41 -0700 Message-ID: <3A879CBD.416B8CF6@xmission.com> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 01:20:13 -0700 From: Paul & Eleanor <goodhill_at_xmission.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch Subject: Re: Nested Groupings References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10102080941200.15462-100000_at_cor.oz.cc.utah.edu> <3A86134D.5090308_at_europa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cavexml_at_karto.baug.ethz.ch Precedence: bulk Reply-To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch
Garry Petrie wrote:
> What you need is indirect references.
>
> linea
> lineb
> linec
> lined
> linee
>
> <group time="...">
> index_of_linea
> index_of_lineb
> </group>
> <group time="...">
> index_of_linec
> index_of_lined
> index_of_linee
> </group>
>
> <group location="...">
> index_of_linea
> index_of_lineb
> index_of_linec
> </group>
> <group location="...">
> index_of_lined
> index_of_linee
> </group>
>
> ALL IN THE SAME FILE.
Garry,
Thanks for the clarifing example. I already posted a nested solution
that demonstrated that groupings need not hang around on their own,
but could be inlined with little grief.
But regardless, this demonstrates that
<group> is a necessary construct. In fact, if "index_of..." is an xref,
then
<group>
</group>
Is probably pretty much like I said it was, with the exclusion of
the ability to nest groups. Leaving out nesting of names is without
benefit as far as I am concerned. I expected to find the names
somewhere
near the data that they name, not somewhere else.
-Paul
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 18:00:01 CET