Re: Spanning trees (again)

From: Paul & Eleanor (goodhill_at_xmission.com)
Date: Wed Feb 14 2001 - 06:55:37 CET

• Next message: Paul & Eleanor: "Re: Finding groupings"
• Previous message: Paul & Eleanor: "Re: Required ability of software? none"
• In reply to: John Halleck: "Spanning trees (again)"

Received: (from mdom_at_localhost) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id GAA03446 for cavexml-outgoing; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 06:52:01 +0100
Received: from mail.xmission.com (mail.xmission.com [198.60.22.22]) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id GAA03442 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 06:52:00 +0100
Received: from slc35.modem.xmission.com ([166.70.9.35] helo=xmission.com) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14SurA-0002rs-00 for cavexml_at_cartography.ch; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:52:00 -0700
Message-ID: <3A8A1DD9.448D46D1@xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:55:37 -0700
From: Paul & Eleanor <goodhill_at_xmission.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch
Subject: Re: Spanning trees (again)
References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10102131128030.21309-100000_at_cor.oz.cc.utah.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cavexml_at_karto.baug.ethz.ch
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch

John Halleck wrote:
> Therefore my comments of the overhead of just having an attribute
> are not valid.

Darn! :-)

-Paul

• Next message: Paul & Eleanor: "Re: Finding groupings"
• Previous message: Paul & Eleanor: "Re: Required ability of software? none"
• In reply to: John Halleck: "Spanning trees (again)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 18:00:01 CET