From: Thrun Robert IHMD (ThrunR_at_ih.navy.mil)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2001 - 22:52:35 CET
Received: (from mdom_at_localhost) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id PAA30772 for cavexml-outgoing; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:51:53 +0100 Received: from ih-router.ih.navy.mil (ih-router.ih.navy.mil [205.68.95.65]) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id WAA26248 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:53:08 +0100 Received: from ih-router.ih.navy.mil (root_at_localhost) by ih-router.ih.navy.mil with ESMTP id QAA13267 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:52:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from ihmdex04.ih.navy.mil (ihmdex04.ih.navy.mil [206.39.129.72]) by ih-router.ih.navy.mil with ESMTP id QAA13263 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:52:12 -0500 (EST) Received: by ihmdex04.ih.navy.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <FKPXVRAH>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:52:36 -0500 Message-ID: <9718D3B1ED18D31180F000A0C99DE22301F7E964@ihmdex03.ih.navy.mil> From: Thrun Robert IHMD <ThrunR_at_ih.navy.mil> To: "'cavexml_at_cartography.ch'" <cavexml_at_cartography.ch> Subject: RE: Stations are primary Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:52:35 -0500 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-cavexml_at_karto.baug.ethz.ch Precedence: bulk Reply-To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch
Ralph Hartley said:
> While might be desirable to have an independent
> unique id for each shot, for stations it is indispensable.
>
I know of four programs that allowed non-unique station names.
For two of the programs it was a design decision. For the
other two, it was inadvertant. These were not names within
different named surveys. They were instances where more than
one station had the same name.
Then there are the untra-simple programs that do not have
station names at all.
Bob Thrun
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 18:00:01 CET