Re: Edited, Final & Leg data

From: Peter MATTHEWS <matthews_at_melbpc.org.au>
Date: Fri Feb 14 2003 - 00:02:44 CET


At 23:09 12-02-03 -0700, P A Hill & E V Goodall wrote:
>Peter MATTHEWS wrote:
>>The list of terms we are considering actually covers more than one data
>>set, and spans between the various measurements taken in the field and
>>the subsequently calculated co-ordinate data which will be used in
>>drafting the map. The term "final" is referring to the final accepted
>>version of one of the data sets, namely - the "field" data set which will
>>form the input data to the data reduction program which will produce the
>>co-ordinate data. It is the final agreed version of the measurements
>>taken in the field. However if there is a more suitable concise term to
>>describe this final version then we could certainly use that instead.
>
>But it ain't even the "final" form of the spherical vectors (or other
>original combinations that make valid "shots"! I still find it a silly
>term. Someone PLEASE suggest a new one.

Sorry Paul, I seem to be still missing your point. Can you spell it out again in a bit more detail.

Peter Received on Fri Feb 14 00:11:37 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 05 2004 - 18:48:49 CEST