From: Richard Knapp (gyp_caver_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:19:19 CET
Received: (from mdom_at_localhost) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id LAA19842 for cavexml-outgoing; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:21:29 +0100 Received: from smtp1.mail.yahoo.com (smtp1.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.69.60]) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with SMTP id LAA19838 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:21:27 +0100 Message-Id: <200101201021.LAA19838@karto.ethz.ch> Received: from slip166-72-184-218.nc.us.prserv.net (HELO Muphin) (166.72.184.218) by smtp.mail.vip.suc.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2001 10:21:33 -0000 X-Apparently-From: <gyp?caver_at_yahoo.com> From: "Richard Knapp" <gyp_caver_at_yahoo.com> To: "cavexml_at_cartography.ch" <cavexml_at_cartography.ch> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 05:19:19 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: "Richard Knapp" <gyp_caver_at_yahoo.com> X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2030 for OS/2 Warp 4.00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: <Comments> Sender: owner-cavexml_at_karto.baug.ethz.ch Precedence: bulk
>What are the pros and cons of actually defining the interpretation
>of this text? Is it any more or less complex to deal with a series of
><Comment> blocks? In my limited processing of XML, I didn't think it
>was.
><Instruments>
> <Comment>
> The compass was refurbished by the manufacture on 1/1/2000
> </Comment>
> <Compass>
> <Correction units= .../>
> <SerialNumber/>
>
>Is that really any different than:
>
><Instruments>
> The compass was refurbished by the manufacture on 1/1/2000
> <Compass>
> <Correction units= .../>
> <SerialNumber/>
Most definately. Without a tag specifying why the data is there, you must rely on the format of XML
document to specify what data is present. That is document-centric, counter to XML's data-centric
structure. This is introducing position (implied meaning) as a key to the text node as opposed to
identity (explict meaning) being stated.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Feb 14 2001 - 00:03:52 CET