Re: CaveXML>Range of Fields

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Michael Lake (mikel_at_speleonics.com.au)
Date: Sat Jan 27 2001 - 02:32:57 CET


Received: (from mdom_at_localhost) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id FAA24389 for cavexml-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 05:05:13 +0100
Received: from iggy.triode.net.au (IDENT:root_at_iggy.triode.net.au [203.63.235.1]) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id FAA24385 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 05:05:11 +0100
Received: from speleonics.com.au (mikel_at_dm1-5.triode.net.au [203.63.34.6]) by iggy.triode.net.au (8.11.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f0R45dP00873 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 15:05:39 +1100
Message-ID: <3A722549.8F0ADDEF@speleonics.com.au>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:32:57 +1100
From: Michael Lake <mikel_at_speleonics.com.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch
Subject: Re: CaveXML>Range of Fields
References: <3A704DAE.BE810444_at_earthlink.net> <002601c08787$a6b776f0$0a3c10ac_at_gordon>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cavexml_at_karto.baug.ethz.ch
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch

Julian Todd wrote:
> 2) Azimuth (measured at a point: the angle of between a line and the
> gravitational field)
Inclination not azimuth.

> 3) Bearing (measured at a point: the horizontal angle between a line and
> magnetic north)
Azimuth: 0-360 where 0 is North
Bearing: 0-90 and is the angle within a quadrant.

> Consider the Depthguage measurement. It has a place, value, units, time,
> instrument-id and person-id.
The later are properties of an instrument and a surveyor not of a measurement.
This is an abstract thing but I think it important to get the abstrct entities
sorted out and not have thw wrong properties attached to an element.
This will be difficult to do.

> The time (incl date) is quite an interesting attribute because the water
> level can change from year to year. Other measurements are more static.
Thats interesting. I had not thought if that.

> Personally, I don't think these higher level groupings are anything more
> than a figment of our imaginations, but that's my own opinion.
True. They are abstractions that place a structure on the data that makes
it ammenable to more intelligent subsequent processing.

> I'll be off Email for a while, so fill my box to overflowing while I'm gone.
:-) hehehehe....

Mike

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Lake
Active caver, Linux enthusiast and interested in anything technical.
Safety Convenor, Australian Speleological Federation
Owner, Speleonics (Australia)
--------------------------------------------------------------------


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Feb 14 2001 - 00:03:53 CET