Re: CaveXML>Range of Fields

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Richard Knapp (gyp_caver_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 02:18:49 CET


Received: (from mdom_at_localhost) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id DAA31006 for cavexml-outgoing; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:25:27 +0100
Received: from smtp1.mail.yahoo.com (smtp1.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.69.60]) by karto.ethz.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with SMTP id DAA31002 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:25:26 +0100
Message-Id: <200101290225.DAA31002@karto.ethz.ch>
Received: from slip166-72-184-5.nc.us.prserv.net (HELO Muphin) (166.72.184.5) by smtp.mail.vip.suc.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 02:25:36 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <gyp?caver_at_yahoo.com>
From: "Richard Knapp" <gyp_caver_at_yahoo.com>
To: "cavexml_at_cartography.ch" <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:18:49 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2030 for OS/2 Warp 4.00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: CaveXML>Range of Fields
Sender: owner-cavexml_at_karto.baug.ethz.ch
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch


>To get the ball rolling on this item from Andreas' Tasks / Todo list, I
>submit the following items (fields) for consideration. Think of these as...

It is not unreasonable to assume individual caves could be grouped in a single file or, by
using XLink, to be grouped through a single file into a cave system. Hence:

- System: a group of related caves
- System Name: The name for this system

This also would cause problems with using "Cave Survey" as the root element. Maybe the
root element should be something like:

- CaveXML: the data storage format of this file (with)
- CaveXML Version: the release of this format.

There is still some akwardness when pulling in other files via XLink, especially if they
conform to difference versions.

>Survey - An actual survey series
>Survey Name - The name applied to this survey

If the survey is continued at a later date, would two entries for one survey cause
problems?

<survey name="A" description="Entrance to first pit" date="1 Jan, 2000">
</survey>
...
<survey name="A" description="From first pit to first crawl" date="3 Feb, 2000">
</survey>

This is more of a chronological orientation but it is possible to also group as:

<survey name="A">
        <subsurvey name="Entrance to first pit" date="1 Jan, 2000">
        </subsurvey>
        <subsurvey name="From first pit to first crawl" date="3 Feb, 2000">
        </subsurvey>
</survey>

>Survey Quality - the impled quality of the survey

Would this be known before the data is compiled?

>Shot - an element of a survey, one leg or shot
>Processing - handling instructions for an item, e.g. correct, ignore,
>subtract, etc.

Would this be the same as attributes? For instance, "do not include in length", "do not
plot", "do not close", "(all of the above)".

>From - orienation of survey leg, necessary for determining Left, Right,
>Up, Down
>To - orienation of survey leg, necessary for determining Left, Right,
>Up, Down

They are also the station IDs.

>Length - measured distance between two points

Is length or distance more correct? The shot has length and there is a distance between to
stations.

>Forward Azimuth - 360 degree compass reading looking from the "From"
>station to the "To" station
>Reverse Azimuth - 360 degree compass reading looking from the "To"
>station to the "From" station

This makes it easier to distinguish between a foresight and backsight. Is a "back shot" a
valid item? Somewhere, it needs to be documented if the angles read are the real angles
or reversed angles. If I have a shot from 1 to 2 and the forward azimuth is 90, the real
backward azimuth is 270. However, there are groups that would read the back azimuth as
90. The same goes for inclination.

>Left - Distance to left wall, when looking forward in the direction of
>survey, at a given station
>Right - Distance to right wall, when looking forward in the direction of
>survey, at a given station
>Up - Distance to ceiling, when looking forward in the direction of
>survey, at a given station
>Down - Distance to floor, when looking forward in the direction of
>survey, at a given station

I think Ceiling and Floor should be a possibility as well. I don't use them but others do.

- Ceiling - distance from floor to ceiling (measurement is vertical);
- Floor - distance from the station to the floor (measurement is vertical);

Also, some way of specifying the orientation of these measurements needs to be given:

        - direction: perpendicular to next, perpendicular to previous, average;
        - reference: relative to caver, relative to station;
        - location: from station, to station, both(!)

>Have at it.

!

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Feb 14 2001 - 00:03:54 CET