Re: ID specification?

From: Richard Knapp (gyp_caver@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Jul 07 2001 - 11:57:06 CEST


On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 11:14:48 -0600 (MDT), John Halleck wrote:

>> > [... Unique Record ID's ...]
>
>> > >http://rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au/~pgm/uisic/exchange/exchprop.html
>
> "nnnnn
> a numeric serial number, being an agreed fixed length for a given
> entity, and padded left with zeros. Unique within a given aa and
> bbb. See Entity List below for
> "
> Making the number field a fixed size puts in assumptions about sizes.
>
> Why do this? (I.E. I don't see any advantage to this, and there are
> obvious problems with it, so I think I missed something.)

I've always like a combination of numbers and characters for keys (ie. "A134BC"). The code is pretty simple to write but it
increases the keys for a given fixed size rather considerably! If the key was 3 digits long, there are then 46656 possible
combinations instead of 1000. I like to limit it to upper case to keep things a little simpler but lower case could be brought in
too.

        - Richard Knapp

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 03 2001 - 06:00:00 CEST