Re: Entities and fields

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: P A Hill & E V Goodall (goodhill_at_xmission.com)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 17:26:52 CEST


Return-Path: <owner-cavexml-outgoing_at_ethz.ch>
Delivered-To: cavexml-archive_at_cartography.ch
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karmail.ethz.ch (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0) with ESMTP id E5AD315876 for <cavexml-outgoing_at_ethz.ch>; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:35:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by karmail.ethz.ch (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0, from userid 28) id C2D2C14ADD; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:35:39 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: cavexml-loopcheck_at_ethz.ch
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karmail.ethz.ch (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0) with ESMTP id B1B8115876 for <cavexml-loopcheck_at_ethz.ch>; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:35:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by karmail.ethz.ch (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0, from userid 96) id 8BEC114874; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:35:36 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karmail.ethz.ch (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0) with ESMTP id 5433A15876 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:35:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mgr3.xmission.com (mgr3.xmission.com [198.60.22.203]) by karmail.ethz.ch (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0) with ESMTP id 0AA998A79 for <cavexml_at_cartography.ch>; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:35:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [198.60.22.200] (helo=mail.xmission.com) by mgr3.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17VD42-0000DM-00 for cavexml_at_cartography.ch; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:19:34 -0600
Received: from goodhill.dsl.xmission.com ([198.60.114.17] helo=xmission.com) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17VD42-00066T-00 for cavexml_at_cartography.ch; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:19:34 -0600
Message-ID: <3D36DE3C.8020600@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:26:52 -0600
From: P A Hill & E V Goodall <goodhill_at_xmission.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch
Subject: Re: Entities and fields
References: <20020718115649.9CD1F8B22_at_karmail.ethz.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: cavexml
Sender: owner-cavexml_at_karmail.ethz.ch
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cavexml_at_cartography.ch
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11

Richard Knapp wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:43:35 +1000, Peter MATTHEWS wrote:
>
>
>>This flags up that I should have included some more definitions under
>>"Other Definitions", especially as XML's use of terms is different to ...
>>
>
>>[snip]
>>
>
>>Field
>> A property of an Entity. In a database table, the fields are normally
>>represented by
>> the columns in the table. For example, "start date" is a field of the
>>entity "trip",
>>
>
> Excellent. However, the definition for Field starts to explain it in
> database terms.

He has choosen Field and then drawn an analogy to 'columns'. I'd say this is
a reasonable way to explain by example. Using a DB term he would have called it
a column straight out :-)

Do you have a better word than "field" we could use to stay away from
attribute or element, both specifically defined in XML?

Now he could explicitly say that a field may map to an element or
an attribute of another element and not just leave it to be surmised by the reader.

-Paul


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jul 31 2002 - 23:00:00 CEST