Paul & Eleanor wrote:
> Garry Petrie wrote:
>
>> I won't touch the computer language question, I can just imagine the raging bulls.
>
> Great, then next time don't mention memory addresses as something useful
> for high-level application data like CaveXML.
Hey, are my comment really that inflammatory? One uses the tools to match the job. What
really burns me up, are those who complain about bloat-ware, yet refuse to learn the
underlying principles necessary to write efficient code. All computer languages have ways
to store data, a "memory address" is just a symbol, a identifier to an object. Please do
not show your fear to learn something new. All this is, is symbol manipulation.
Garry Petrie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 02 2001 - 18:00:00 CEST