On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Richard Knapp wrote:
> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:23:30 -0500 (EST)
> From: Richard Knapp <gyp_caver@yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: cavexml@cartography.ch
> To: "cavexml@cartography.ch" <cavexml@cartography.ch>
> Subject: Re: Validing proposed CaveXML DTD's.
>
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:22:38 -0700 (MST), John Halleck wrote:
>
> >> Very picky. Didn't like comments and didn't like ENTITY.
> >
> > It has passed many of my DTD's with comments. Rememeber that comments
> > can't go anywhere.
> >
> > I'd have to see the DTD in question to see what complaint it had about
> > entities.
>
> It was the one I had posted. I started not liking the first the first bit (first line) then really didn't like my Entity's.
Where is the <?XML stuff (Comments can't come before it.)
(And it should be on any external entry.)
> <!-- general entities for use later -->
>
> <!ENTITY % BaseAnglesUnits "Degrees | DMS | Mills | Grad">
> <!ENTITY % AndBearing "| Bearing">
> <!ENTITY % AndPercent "| Percent">
> <!ENTITY % AzimuthUnits "%BaseAnglesUnits;%AndBearing;">
> <!ENTITY % InclinationUnits "%BaseAnglesUnits;%AndPercent;">
> <!ENTITY % LengthUnits "Feet | FeetInch | Meter | CM">
>
> Thinking more about it, it could be because the DTD is _not_ internal to an XML document; it is separate. The
> only option I saw was to send it a document and that might have been why I got so much spit in my face as a
> result.
You could just paste it in.
>
> FWIW....
>
> - Richard Knapp
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 02 2001 - 18:00:00 CEST